Thursday, February 19, 2026
Lost
Saturday, April 19, 2025
CONRADO NUÑEZ, JR. VS. SPOUSES OSCAR AND NORMA NUNEZ
CONRADO NUÑEZ, JR. VS. SPOUSES OSCAR AND NORMA NUNEZ
G.R. No. 267108
February 05, 2025
FACTS:
Spouses Nuñez, Conrado and Maria had six children. According to the petitioners, Maria and her family occupied a parcel of land, the Corregidor Property since the early 1960’s. In 1988, to develop the property, Oscar, one of the children was tasked to process a loan with the ADB to fund the development. The Corregidor Property was used as a collateral for the loan. Maria died in 1988 and after full payment of the loan, the petitioners discovered that Maria’s title and tax declaration were already cancelled, and a title of ownership was issued in the name of Oscar.
Friday, April 18, 2025
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. JEORGE EJERCITO ESTREGAN
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. JEORGE EJERCITO ESTREGAN
G.R. No. 248699
February 05, 2025
FACTS:
Accused public officers of the municipality of Pagsanjan, Laguna entered a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for Accident Protection and Assistance (APA) with Bruel, proprietor of First Rapids Care Ventures (FRCV), without public bidding and despite the fact that FCRV holds no Certificate of Authority from the Insurance Commission.
Later, the United Boatmen Association of Pagsanjan (UBAP) filed a complaint for violation of Section 3(e), (g), (h), (i) and (g) of RA 3019 and RA 9184 against the said public officials as well as Bruel before the Ombudsman. The OMB found probable cause to indict the accused. The SBN acquitted Vilar but found the rest guilty. MRs were denied hence this appeal.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. YBO LASTIMOSA
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. YBO LASTIMOSA
G.R. No. 265758
February 03, 2025
FACTS:
On or about the 17th day of November 2012 at about 4:30 in the afternoon the said accused, armed with a firearm of unknown caliber, with deliberate intent, with intent to kill, and with treachery and evident premeditation, did then and there attack, assault and shot one ILDEFONSO VEGA, JR., with said firearm, thereby inflicting upon him fatal gunshot wounds, and as a consequence of said injuries, Ildefonso Vega, Jr. died. Instantaneously. The RTC found Lastimosa guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Homicide. The CA found Lastimosa guilty of the crime of Murder, instead of Homicide.
ROWENA MANLUTAC GREEN VS. JEFFERY A. GREEN
ROWENA MANLUTAC GREEN VS. JEFFERY A. GREEN AND THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
G.R. No. 255706
February 17, 2025
FACTS:
Jeffery, a US retiree, met Rowena in a bar. Jeffery knew Rowena had two children from a previous relationship, and Rowena knew Jeffery was married to another, but that his divorce was still pending. Jeffery and Rowena got married at St. Ignatius de Loyola Cathedral in Quezon City. Later, Jeffery filed a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage with Rowena with the RTC based on the basis of both parties’ psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code. Aside from documentary evidence proving Rowena's infidelity, lies, and debts, Jeffery attached a Psychiatric Evaluation Report made by Dr. Manalo-Arcena after conducting interviews with Jeffery, Rowena, Rowena's mother, and the spouses' mutual friend. The RTC granted the petition. The CA affirmed the Decision of the RTC.MR was denied. Hence this petition.
Another Place to check out in Elyu- Ynad's Place Hotel and Resort
People of the Philippines vs. Valeriano Ducosin
People of the Philippines vs. Valeriano Ducosin
G.R. No. 38332
December 14, 1933
FACTS:
On or about the 23d day of September, 1932, in the City of Manila, Philippine Islands, the accused did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously, and with intent to kill, treacherously attack, assault and wound one Rafael Yanguas by then and there suddenly and without any warning, stabbing the latter with a knife, thereby inflicting upon him several wounds in different parts of the body, some of which are necessarily mortal, thus performing all the acts of execution which would produce the death of the said Rafael Yanguas as a consequence, but which, nevertheless, did not produce it by reason of causes independent of the will of said accused, that is, by the timely intervention of medical assistance. The accused pleaded guilty. The Court of First Instance convicted him of the crime of frustrated murder and was sentenced to ten years and one day of prision mayor with the accessory penalties prescribed by law and to pay the costs.
Appeal was made to the SC for the proper interpretation of Act No. 4103 or the “Indeterminate Sentence Law”.
Hi there!
LIKE us on Facebook
POPULAR POSTS
-
HASEGAWA vs. KITAMURA G.R. No. 149177 November 23, 2007 FACTS: Petitioner Nippon is a Japanese consultancy firm providing tec...
-
Dear Dad, Hi there! Hey, I came to visit the other day. I didn't see you. I suppose you weren't there. It was too g...
-
G.R. No. 106720 September 15, 1994 SPOUSES ROBERTO AND THELMA AJERO, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS AND CLEMENTE SAND, respon...
-
If you're looking for parking at Heathrow airport, there are a number of ways to find what you need quickly and easily. Although ...
-
I can still remember the first time I got an "oh am gee," comment on a post. It was on a post I wrote on my now extinct friendste...
Blog Archive
FEATURED POST


