Thursday, February 19, 2026
Lost
Saturday, April 19, 2025
CONRADO NUÑEZ, JR. VS. SPOUSES OSCAR AND NORMA NUNEZ
CONRADO NUÑEZ, JR. VS. SPOUSES OSCAR AND NORMA NUNEZ
G.R. No. 267108
February 05, 2025
FACTS:
Spouses Nuñez, Conrado and Maria had six children. According to the petitioners, Maria and her family occupied a parcel of land, the Corregidor Property since the early 1960’s. In 1988, to develop the property, Oscar, one of the children was tasked to process a loan with the ADB to fund the development. The Corregidor Property was used as a collateral for the loan. Maria died in 1988 and after full payment of the loan, the petitioners discovered that Maria’s title and tax declaration were already cancelled, and a title of ownership was issued in the name of Oscar.
Friday, April 18, 2025
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. JEORGE EJERCITO ESTREGAN
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. JEORGE EJERCITO ESTREGAN
G.R. No. 248699
February 05, 2025
FACTS:
Accused public officers of the municipality of Pagsanjan, Laguna entered a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for Accident Protection and Assistance (APA) with Bruel, proprietor of First Rapids Care Ventures (FRCV), without public bidding and despite the fact that FCRV holds no Certificate of Authority from the Insurance Commission.
Later, the United Boatmen Association of Pagsanjan (UBAP) filed a complaint for violation of Section 3(e), (g), (h), (i) and (g) of RA 3019 and RA 9184 against the said public officials as well as Bruel before the Ombudsman. The OMB found probable cause to indict the accused. The SBN acquitted Vilar but found the rest guilty. MRs were denied hence this appeal.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. YBO LASTIMOSA
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. YBO LASTIMOSA
G.R. No. 265758
February 03, 2025
FACTS:
On or about the 17th day of November 2012 at about 4:30 in the afternoon the said accused, armed with a firearm of unknown caliber, with deliberate intent, with intent to kill, and with treachery and evident premeditation, did then and there attack, assault and shot one ILDEFONSO VEGA, JR., with said firearm, thereby inflicting upon him fatal gunshot wounds, and as a consequence of said injuries, Ildefonso Vega, Jr. died. Instantaneously. The RTC found Lastimosa guilty beyond reasonable doubt of Homicide. The CA found Lastimosa guilty of the crime of Murder, instead of Homicide.
Hi there!
LIKE us on Facebook
POPULAR POSTS
-
HASEGAWA vs. KITAMURA G.R. No. 149177 November 23, 2007 FACTS: Petitioner Nippon is a Japanese consultancy firm providing tec...
-
G.R. No. 106720 September 15, 1994 SPOUSES ROBERTO AND THELMA AJERO, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS AND CLEMENTE SAND, respon...
-
If you're looking for parking at Heathrow airport, there are a number of ways to find what you need quickly and easily. Although ...
-
Dear Dad, Hi there! Hey, I came to visit the other day. I didn't see you. I suppose you weren't there. It was too g...
-
I can still remember the first time I got an "oh am gee," comment on a post. It was on a post I wrote on my now extinct friendste...
Blog Archive
FEATURED POST
